• Hildegarde
    link
    fedilink
    -55 months ago

    I’m a green voter. I have voted green in the past three presidential elections, and intend to do so again this year. If you have an argument as to why that’s a bad idea that isn’t one that I’ve heard before, get in touch!

    • @obre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      95 months ago

      Because of the nature of FPTP voting it only matters if you’re in a swing state. If you’re voting green from a solidly blue state, keep at it, but if you’re in i.e. Michigan or Nevada, please reconsider.

      • Hildegarde
        link
        fedilink
        -55 months ago

        My only regret in 2016 was not living in a swing state. I know how ftpt works.

        Democrats can earn my vote by implementing ranked choice voting. They’re a solid 3rd choice pick on the ballot.

        • @Freefall@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          25 months ago

          It’s FPTP, but ok.

          In that system, it is two-party and people who didn’t vote for the opponent of the winner, gave their vote to the winner (it was one less vote needed to win). You can never win with your candidate but you make the winning side need one less vote…just like if you voted for them. In some cases, like green party, they would only vote blue if they literally had no choice but red and blue. So they are always taking a vote away from blue. Every single election, green party voters have only helped the GOP. Like libertarians voting third party only ever helps the Democrats.

          • Hildegarde
            link
            fedilink
            05 months ago

            Democrats have had many opportunities to push for ranked choice voting but chose not to. How is ftpt the fault of the parties that have never had the power to do anything about it?

            • @Freefall@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              35 months ago

              It is F P T P…and yeah, full voting reform takes time. SOME STATES have ranked choice or at least a representative split of their electoral votes instead of winner take all…just like SOME STATES started with weed legalization and it spread, SOME STATES started with abolishing slavery and it spread…we are JUST getting it going and we might lose any chance at it if p2025 gets pushed through and we lose all hope of it. Read about p2025 and the entrenchment of garbage people into every facit of our government so we don’t have a chance of it spreading ever again…assuming we get to actually vote (and not end up with a Russian “democracy”).

              It is just a confluence of bad timings as inaction was finally starting to become change.

    • @pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      115 months ago

      you’ve probably heard this before, but you’ve been voting republican for three elections. the fact that you’ve heard it before doesn’t make it untrue, it just makes you vote republican on purpose.

      • Hildegarde
        link
        fedilink
        -45 months ago

        I heard that argument in 2016 and it hadn’t become any less false than it was then.

        33.1% of eligible voters didn’t vote in 2020, 40.8% didn’t vote in 2016. Your priorities are misplaced. You should be more concerned about these nonvoters, they outnumber third party voters seventeenfold and are far less stubborn.

        You haven’t changed my mind.

        • @pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          55 months ago

          first of all, there are no priorities, you asked about your vote and I answered. i would say the same to a nonvoter.

          second of all, oh wait i did. because you are not really different from a nonvoter. except as you admitted more stubborn… so you’re just worse. thanks for just volunteering that info.

          you can add yourself to the 40.8% because you’re all doing the same thing: voting for the republican party.

          • Hildegarde
            link
            fedilink
            -45 months ago

            People are far more likely to call out or blame third party voters than nonvoters, despite nonvoters having an order of magnitude larger effect on the outcome. I wasn’t meaning to call you out specifically.

            However, I think you should probably stop encouraging third party and nonvoters to vote for republicans. That doesn’t seem to be in your best interest.

            • @pyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              25 months ago

              they do it because at least nonvoters can say they’re too lazy or apathetic. the fact that you get your ass all the way to the ballot box to essentially do the same thing does attract some attention.

              also take your threats to someone who thinks it holds any weight; i personally don’t give a shit if you vote republican or third party or not at all, cause as I’ve been saying, they’re the same vote. if you don’t vote D you’re voting R one way or another.

              • Hildegarde
                link
                fedilink
                -15 months ago

                … Is far easier to convince someone who hasn’t already made up their mind. Spend your time productively.

                I do not make threats. I have never made any threats. Your argument reads far more as encouragement to vote for an R instead of a D. That is an unwise argument to make if you care about maximizing the number of D votes.

                But I’m voting G regardless. Goodbye!

                  • @Freefall@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    15 months ago

                    He is voting R in a way that makes him feel good. There is no argument to be made against a position where no logic was applied.

      • Hildegarde
        link
        fedilink
        -95 months ago

        If it wasn’t for democrats and republicans spoiling the election, yes!

        • ObliviousEnlightenment
          link
          fedilink
          25 months ago

          The smaller party is the spoiler, and the big parties wont just…not run. Barring electoral reform, under what circumstances do you think they could actually win? Please remember to account for strategic voting

    • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -1
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Voting Green appears to be the way to go. Current Democrats are unwilling to compromise on anything, not even stop a Genocide.

      Promoting this behavior any further is the actual biggest danger to democracy not their permastuck 2016 fiction of having to save democracy every 4 years.

      • @Freefall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -15 months ago

        I can’t my head around how voting Republican stops genocide…that is a leap in logic my brain just isn’t doing.

        • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          I can’t my head around how voting Democrat stops genocide…that is a leap in logic my brain just isn’t doing.

          My statement is actually not a strawman. Sad reality.

          • @Freefall@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -15 months ago

            Nobody said voting Democrat will stop genocide…you said voting Republican will. Just trying to figure out how.

    • @Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      75 months ago

      I mean I was green but I left it after the party nominees were all garbage rich fucks who mostly just seem to like being popular and having money.

      Plus after the hissy fit of blaming other parties for not getting their own paperwork in order and demanding the party members not vote in protest which doesn’t respect the importance of voting.

      But hey you do you.

      • Hildegarde
        link
        fedilink
        -25 months ago

        Is there a party without rich fucks? I would prefer that but I’m yet to find one.

        • @Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          05 months ago

          Not really but I don’t need to support another one who brags about getting air time in Russia because it doesn’t matter what person is talking about them as long as they feel special. That’s a level of incompetence I don’t think is better than the current.