Teen boys use AI to make fake nudes of classmates, sparking police probe::Parents told the high school “believed” the deepfake nudes were deleted.

  • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️A
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -51 year ago

    If you’re making porn of real underage people, I have no problem with you being put on the pedo registry.

    If no serious harm was done, I’m fine with convicting them and then doing full expungement after 5-10 years.

    • XIIIesq
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      That’s an easy enough judgement when the perpetrator is an adult. What do you do when the perpetrator is a minor themselves? As they are in this article.

      Of course their still needs to be some sort of recourse, but for every other crime there is a difference between being tried as a child or being tried as an adult.

      I find it tough to consider myself.

      • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️A
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        Considering the consequences for a high school student if porn of them gets circulated, I’m fine with putting them on the registry. Expungement can happen later based on the aftermath. Teenage girls have killed themselves over this sort of thing.

    • Jolteon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      I’d argue that someone making porn of someone their own age is not pedophilia.

      • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️A
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -31 year ago

        They’re still making porn of a minor. That is harmful to them and it enables any pedophiles who find it.

    • @wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      261 year ago

      And youre proof that the pedo registry shouldnt exist as is.

      Teenagers being sexually interested in their peers is not pedophilia, and you want to ruin a decade of their life guaranteed, with the “”“”““promise””“”“”" of an expungement that would never actually happen thanks to the permanent nature of the internet for it.

      This misuse of AI is a crime and should be punished and deterred, obviously. But labeling children about to enter the world as pedophiles basically for the rest of their lives?

      Youre kind of a monster.

      • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️A
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -51 year ago

        If you produce CP, you should be on a registry for producing and distributing CP. If you create CP, you are enabling pedophilia.

        • @wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          They are children. Being horny about classmates.

          Being sexually aroused by people your own age and wishing to fantasize about it is not enabling pedophilia, you literal psychopath.

          • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️A
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -41 year ago

            Circulating porn of minors is a crime and enables pedophiles. Not to mention teenage girls could easily commit suicide over something like this.

            • @Fades@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So does yearbook and any other kind of photos that depict children for that matter

              You can’t keep pushing the goal posts, by your logic young people should never date or take photos together because it could enable pedophiles somewhere somehow

              These are children with brains still in development, they are discovering themselves and you want to label them forever a pedophile because they didn’t make a conscious effort to research how their spanking material could potentially enable a pedo (because we all know pedos can only be enabled by things produced by kids… yeah that’s the real threat)

              Instead of suggesting a way to help the victims you are advocating for the creation of yet more victims

              What a pathetic brain dead stance you are defending

              • @eatthecake@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                Abuse and bullying of their classmates is just ‘discovering themselves’? Discovering that they’re psychopathic little mysoginists I guess. Their ‘spanking material’ was created in order to demean and huumiliate their victims. There’s plenty of porn online and absolutely no need for them to do this. If you actuslly wanted to help the victims you would not be trivialising and excusing this behaviour as ‘being horny about classmates’.

                • @wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  And an AI image with a face photoshopped over it isnt a photo of a child.

                  And a teen being sexually interested in other teens isnt a pedophile.

      • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️A
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        What about the fact that the girls who are victims of something like this will have to contend with the pictures being online if someone posts them there? What if people who don’t know that the pictures depict minors re-post them to other sites, making them very difficult to remove? That can cause very serious employablity problems. It doesn’t matter how open minded people are, they don’t want porn coming up if someone googles one of their employees.