edited from talent to job

  • @Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    026 days ago

    None. Maybe some middle management, but even then, until AI fixes the hallucinations for good, in useless

  • Greg Clarke
    link
    fedilink
    English
    126 days ago

    Currently very few jobs should be replaced with AI. But many jobs should be augmented with AI. Human-in-the-loop AI amplify the finate resource of smart humans.

  • @Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1525 days ago

    Any body-breaking heavy labour. Emphasis on body-breaking; there’s nothing wrong with hard work, but there are certain people that believe hard work = leaving your body destroyed at 50.

  • @cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    626 days ago

    Reform tax law and get rid of 90% of the IRS. Computers could do all that shit if we simplified the system. Will never happen, though.

  • @TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    126 days ago

    Realistically, a lot of the stock photo industry. If a few people can generate pictures on demand, you won’t really need anyone doing sets, lights, wardrobe, etc for a series of generic photos .

    • @jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      224 days ago

      Yeh I think people like this idea because of a kind of ironic poetic justice since it’s those guys who wanted to replace everyone else except themselves with AI, but if you think about how much you hated those uncaring bastards operating like robots just to extract an ounce of profit at whatever the human cost, imagine now actually being a robot. Also, if you ever had to deal with bullshit from those guys and resented having to grin and bear it even though you don’t think they’re particularly qualified and also know nothing about your job, imagine having to be “managed” by a fucking robot that tries to say patronising encouraging things because it’s learned the very best pattern of speech to get the behaviour it wants out of you. Admittedly at least some of the decision making might be a bit more rational, but then every now and then AI gets things totally out of wack in the strangest ways and you’ll have to just take those decisions, from a damn machine.

  • @AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    None. The current ones with internet content, reporting, and call centers are already making things worse. Just no.

    It can definitely be a useful tool though, as long as you understand its limitations. My kids school had them feed an outline to ChatGPT and correct the result. Excellent

    • consultants generate lots of reports that ai can help with
    • I find ai useful to summarize chat threads that are lower priority
    • a buddy of mine uses it as a first draft to summarize his teams statuses
    • I’m torn on code solutions. Sometimes it’s really nice but you can’t forward a link. More importantly the people who need it most are least likely to notice where it hallucinates. Boilerplate works a little better
  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
    link
    fedilink
    English
    226 days ago

    CEO, politician… I guess that’s it. Except I don’t actually want an AI making our laws for us. That would be a catastrophe.