• @cogitoprinciple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    Why can’t we just be ourselves, without NTs imposing judgement on us? Sometimes I feel like I’m expected to act NT, when I feel like it shouldn’t be a big deal. It’s very frustrating for me. So what if I don’t know how to add to a conversation, or if I avoid eye contact, or if I don’t like people trying to make eye contact with me for too long? Can’t I just share that I’m autistic, and be given my own autonomy? I really don’t like when NT standards are imposed on me. It makes me angry.

  • @Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    381 year ago

    Image Transcription: Tumblr


    lifeinautismworld

    “Autistic people are too sensitive.”

    Meanwhile, here’s a list of things that offend allistic people.

    • not making eye contact

    • wanting to be left alone

    • not wanting to take part in a conversation

    • using the wrong tone

    • showing the wrong amount of excitement

    • pointing instead of using words

    • not wanting to be touched

    • not wanting to eat certain foods

    • wearing earplugs around other people

    • stimming in a way that does not affect anyone else

    • not following traditions

    • questioning their authority

    • Ataraxia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -81 year ago

      Also how are any of these things autistic traits? I’m sitting here chewing my tongue raw for the last 5 years and haven’t gone outside since, have no interest in socialization and have misphonia yet watch asmr. I’m not autistic.

      • @Fog0555@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        How do you know you’re not autistic vs undiagnosed vs misdiagnosed vs the definition of autistic is too vague?

    • clara
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 year ago

      you’re entirely right. allistic is silly. i think it’s slightly worse than silly though. i have two takes on this.

      my first take is that you shouldn’t slur people.

      my second is that if you’re gonna slur someone anyway, don’t be a chicken; just slur them. hiding behind “allistic” is a little bit like hiding behind “youths”, or “fruity”, or “welfare scroungers”, or “special”, or when people do that thing where they go “…she… oh sorry i mean he” (and vice-versa). it’s either a dogwhistle, or dogwhislte-adjacent. we all know what the speaker is implying when they uses these terms. you’re just slurring someone without the confidence necessary to do so.

      this is why i unironically use normie (on the internet). sometimes i want to be rude about it, y’know? am in the wrong to slur like this? yes, absolutely. whilst i might use normie in the context of venting, it still doesn’t make it right. but at least i’m not being a coward about my position by hiding behind “allistic”

      sometimes, especially when i’m chatting amongst autistics, it’s easier to casually write “when normies do x it upsets me, how about you?” instead of writing formal prose like “Oh I must say! These dastardly Neurotypicals have a particular behaviour pattern that troubles my mind… Do tell me how you bear the burden of such travesties.”.

      doing the formal thing is tiring, and sometimes i don’t want to be the better person. 😎👍

    • @Moneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 year ago

      Also who the fuck is calling autistic people too sensitive? This image is like victim fetishizing.

      • BOMBSM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        221 year ago

        I don’t know about all autistic people, but over 75% of the people I’ve had a considerable relationship with have called me too sensitive at some point. It’s one of the hallmarks of being me: waiting for the moment someone calls me too sensitive. The other is being called an asshole because I apparently made some implication I was completely unaware of.

        • @whatwhatwutyut@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Same. This is exactly what happens to me. Along with letting someone know at the beginning of a friendship that “hey sometimes people perceive me as an asshole or overly sensitive” and getting “oh I don’t think you seem like that at all” only for them to tell me I’m an asshole or sensitive months later… and I don’t feel like I’ve changed how I act at all in that time

    • @Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      First time ive heard it. I genuinely dont mind it. Its a bit odd but its fun.

      Is it pronounced or-listic or al-istic?

    • @1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I dont agree it’s about authority at all. This entire list is about showing disrespect for someone and expecting them to be OK with it.

      To allistic people, everything on this list is insulting behavior that will offend them (except not wanting to eat certain foods).

      This behavior will work fine with autistic people though. But you can’t expect it to work with allistic people.

      Different brains equals different expectations of what is acceptable social behavior. That’s it.

      • @Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Yeah well when “respect” means “micro managing myself to glorify someone else because they demand it”, then yeah. I’m disrespectful as fuck. Anyone who demands I show my belly so they can feel like they’re in charge can kindly go fuck themselves. They’re not in charge. Nobody gets that special pampering from me.

      • JoYo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        people get right indignant when encountering someone else’s food choices.

        i hear the difference between an allergy and an intolerance as if that changes the amount of suffering endured.

      • @FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        301 year ago

        not everyone is offended by these behaviors. what’s more insulting is lumping all autistic people together, and lumping all non-autistic people together assuming that they all feel the same way. it’s THAT sort of behavior that makes people turn on the other.

        • @1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -41 year ago

          I know what you mean but it’s hard to talk about these things without generalizing, since we can’t ask everyone on the planet how they feel.

            • @isles@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              That is literally everyone. Everyone’s brain runs on assumptions. Every model is wrong, but some are useful.

          • @Hobo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s super easy actually! You just qualify your statements. For example:

            • I don’t like how some people…

            • I’ve noticed that a lot of people…

            • There’s quite a few people that…

            • The majority of people seem to…

            This language avoid assumptions about how everyone else feels and leaves the reader an out to say to themselves, “I’m not in that group and they acknowledge that I am an exception.” It avoids the trap of over generalization and doesn’t put the reader on the defensive. Language like “all people” and “allistic people” (meaning all non-autistic people) only work to alienate. Ironically it demonstrates the same behavior they appear to be complaining about…

            • @1984@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ok sure, but another way would be to realize that when me or someone else says “autistic people”, we mean “my experience with autistic people”.

              Since obviously I haven’t met all autistic people in the world, and obviously I don’t speak for all. I have an opinion based in my experience. In fact, everything I write is based on my personal experience.

              When you write something to me here on Lemmy, I read it as “your opinion about x” without you have to tell me that in every single post. It’s a bit smarter to think about posts that way I believe.

              • @Hobo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                Maybe don’t generalize a group of people without careful thought and appropriate caveats then? Seems pretty easy to me. You even admit that you are writing from personal experience, and don’t have perfect information, so why not include precise language to reflect that? Seems pretty simple and way more inclusive.

                Like I said previously, using precise language simply avoids putting readers that are a part of whatever group on the automatic defensive. Why not just take the extra couple of a seconds to avoid that miscommunication? If you don’t care to do that, then that’s fine, but over generalization is going to automatically alienate some readers that you perhaps didn’t mean to offend.

                • @1984@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  41 year ago

                  Yeah I don’t want to offend anyone but at the same time, I don’t want to go through the steps you mentioned in every single post where I express an opinion.

                  So I think I will have to be OK with some people being offended by me not specifically explaining that I don’t speak for everyone.

        • bruhduh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          Eh, these kind of people are always throwing tantrum no matter agreed or refused playing their dominance games, i personally try to avoid such people, filter out negativity and only keep positivity, also i relate strongly to your comment

        • @jimbo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m really struggled with figuring out how anything on that list has anything to do with “dominance”.

        • @1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          I just told you it’s not about dominance or authority, but sure, you probably think it is, since your response is immature and ridiculous.

  • @LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    not wanting to be touched

    That was a big one that contributed to my divorce. Even after decades and with the person who was supposed to be my closest relationship, and even after explaining a million times that the worse my autoimmune illness got, the less I wanted to be touched, it was a massive problem.

    I still don’t get it, because I’ve never once thought someone else not wanting me to touch them impacted me in any way. I also never feel the need to touch other people. I guess that’s weird.

    • @Sanyanov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      Touch is a form of intimacy, one your partner has been severely deprived of. As a heavily tactile person, partner that doesn’t want to be touched would be a massive showstopper for me.

      Sad it turned out this way, but great if you’ll find a partner that respects this boundaries more, or, better yet, doesn’t want to touch you either.

    • @Fal@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 year ago

      There’s a huge difference between “someone else” and your life partner.

  • moosetwin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    ah yes because my teenage neighbor is going to be very angry at me if I don’t follow traditions

  • @letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    I don’t think they are all the same, and not all of them cause “offence”.

    “using the wrong tone” is by definition wrong, so of course it will cause confusion and irritation.

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -71 year ago

    To be honest, I think autistic people are normal and the neurotypicals have something wrong with them.

    How do they subconsciously know all of these cultural and social norms that don’t need to be said? That’s some Children of the Corn shit if you ask me

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      It’s more that they expect their social needs to be recognzed and acknowledged without cues. We see it most among elites and positions of authority, such as US Senators and Representatives behaving like immature children, in contrast to conduct suitable for their office.

      When MTG tweets racist dog whistles for likes, or Lindey Graham has a meltdown with a hot camera, it shows us they take their positions for granted. It shows they expect to be handled and accommodated and they don’t take their offices seriously.

      Whereas we neurodivergents develop personal symptom management techniques (like stimming) in order to function and be of service to the community around us. This is how we cope so that we can do things and not freak others out.

    • @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I take the reason you say this is cause your not on the spectrum?

      Most things neurodivergent are actually stuff thats normal and common. Like needing some alone time, but its the degree of intensity, persevering need for those things that make it fit outside the norm.

      A fun fact, we have a lot of ties to the roots of the lgbt community. Something about not letting norms and tradition decide how you should think and act. To be different often isn’t a choice and the right for us to exist differently is a matter of survival.

  • @rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Well, between two sides picking different ways to do eye contact and tone to use there’s no reason to call one way and one tone wrong and another correct. Same about wanting or not wanting to do anything. So the author of that list, if sincere, is not “allistic”, just assholeistic.

    Also - I personally question someone’s authority only when it’s correct in the ongoing argument.

    However, I usually ignore any authority I consider invalid. That’s not the same as “questioning”, as I’m not doing that demonstrably, that is, socially, just don’t let it in onto my personal territory, speaking figuratively. And thus is not someone else’s concern.

    • BOMBSM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      when has “realism” mattered in what anybody thought?

      According to Wikipedia, since at least the Classical Period of Ancient Greece.